M-1 Rifle WW2
#20

Official nomenclature -- US rifle, cal.30, M1

 

I will refer to these rifles as "Garands" (after the inventor, John C. Garand) hereafter as a matter of convenience for that was a term of endearment and convenience employed by so many GIs. I have shot many thousands of rounds using the Garand rifle -- it was indeed a superb Infantry weapon. In addition to its superior rate of aimed fire, it had the best issue sights I have encountered on a military rifle (positive click adjustments for elevation and windage) and was extremely accurate and very reliable.

 

They made up into excellent target rifles and accurized versions were produced by Military Marksmanship Centers -- with polished sears/hammer hooks, crisply adjusted trigger pulls and carefully bedded barrelled actions in the stocks -- I have scored several possibles (100x100) at 600 yds on the "B" (National Match course) target using two such rifles which I was issued and fired in competitive matches continuously for five years with occasional tune-ups.

 

I have also fired Springfield bolt action rifles (US Rifle, cal.30, Model 1903, A1 and A3) extensively. This was also a fine Infantry weapon although the rate of aimed fire was naturally not on a par with the Garand and the sights were inferior by comparison (although the "peep" rear sight on the A3 model was a big improvement over the open sight models).

 

Both the Garand and Springfield 1903 rifles used the 30/06 rimless cartridge -- a very powerful and accurate round. The commonest cartridge configuration issued in WWII used the 150 grain flat based cupro-nickle bullet at muzzle velocity of approx. 2800 fps -- tracer, incendiary and armor-piercing versions were issued in lesser quantities. Some long range cartridges (AKA competition cartridges) using a 172 grain boat-tail cupro-nickle bullet at a muzzle velocity of approx 2650 fps were issued, mainly for use in sniper rifles (equipped with leather cheek pieces and telescopic scope sights).

 

Both rifles were equipped with leather (older pre-war) or web adjustable slings and the Springfield with the M1 (earlier WWI vintage) bayonet and the Garand with either the M1 or M5 (short WWII) bayonet.

 

Incidentally, the Garand can be readily loaded with a partial clip by those who attain the skill -- usually target competition shooters who are used to initially loading with a partial clip of two rounds at the start of each rapid fire string (loading with a full eight round clip after the first two rounds are discharged) -- I can load a partial clip with ease and reasonable rapidity (I have had a lot of practice). I think the old saw about a weakness of the Garand being the "ping" of the ejected clip allowing a rush by an opponent during the reloading of a new clip in combat is overblown and somewhat of a myth. Even a moderately dexterous soldier can reload very rapidly and resume delivering aimed fire in a split second. It can also be loaded and fired as a single shot weapon if the need should arise, in fact, that is the way it is used in competitive/qualification long range shooting (600 & 1000 yards).

 

The Garand was the standard US issue Infantry rifle in WWII (and also in the Korean War). It was in general use by early 1942. The last unit to use 1903 Springfield rifles as standard issue was the US Marine Corps at Guadalcanal -- once they saw the effectiveness of the Garands in the hands of the Army units they soon adopted that weapon (and some Johnson rotary magazine semi-automatic rifles). The Springfield 1903 rifle was issued and used in a sniper configuration on a limited basis during WWII (and also in the Korean War).

 

In my opinion the best features of the "Garand" are its property of being able to deliver rapid aimed fire, its rugged reliability & dependability and its excellent sights.

 

The feared "M1 thumb" is a rookie mistake experienced when first learning to handle the rifle in basic training -- it is a result of incorrect handling during dissassembly and assembly training and dry firing exercises -- depressing the follower with the bolt locked open without controlling the operating rod handle -- the bolt then slams shut on the thumb (or fingers) producing a painful bruise. The correct drill is to position the heel of the right hand against the operating rod handle to prevent it from flying forward as the thumb depresses the follower -- just allowing the bolt to engage the bevelled rear of the follower then swinging the hand up and away thereby allowing the bolt to lock home.

 

Most recruits experience an "M1 thumb" at least once (the painful lesson is usually well learned) and it is considered a rite of passage by many small arms instructors. This situation does not occur during live firing as the top round in the clip controls the operating rod closure.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Cadetat6 - 03-05-2005, 08:15 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Walt's Daughter - 03-05-2005, 05:53 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Cadetat6 - 03-05-2005, 06:06 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Walt's Daughter - 03-05-2005, 06:27 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by texas38 - 03-05-2005, 08:13 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Walt's Daughter - 03-05-2005, 09:58 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Cadetat6 - 03-06-2005, 05:16 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Walt's Daughter - 03-06-2005, 05:26 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by pdhinkle - 03-15-2005, 10:39 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Custermen - 03-15-2005, 11:30 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by j3rdinf - 03-16-2005, 09:01 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Walt's Daughter - 03-16-2005, 09:07 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by texas38 - 03-16-2005, 11:43 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Walt's Daughter - 03-17-2005, 12:13 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Custermen - 03-17-2005, 12:16 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by texas38 - 03-17-2005, 03:23 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Custermen - 03-21-2005, 01:07 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by texas38 - 03-21-2005, 02:36 AM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by Custermen - 03-21-2005, 12:35 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by James Pickering - 04-03-2005, 10:27 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by j3rdinf - 04-05-2005, 03:28 PM
M-1 Rifle WW2 - by James Pickering - 04-05-2005, 07:49 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Army M-1 Rifle Cadetat6 8 66,097 02-07-2005, 09:31 PM
Last Post: texas38



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)