Jump to content
New Registrations Read more... ×
Research Assistance Donations Read more... ×
Apologies - Forum was down for several days Read more... ×

VI CORPS AND 5TH & 7TH ARMIES

Would love to hear from anyone that was involved in the campaigns that the 36th, 39th, or 540th participated in. This includes the 3rd, 34th, 36th or 45th Infantry Divisions, the 1st Armored Division, 82nd Airborne or any other related units. Please note that all the above units were a part of the VI Corps, 5th and/or 7th Armies during the ETO from 1942-1945, some for more extended periods than others.

Thanks for your participation. Your stories make this site even better!


Forum Rules

Would love to hear from any combat engineers or anyone that was involved in the campaigns that the 36th, 39th, or 540th participated in. This includes the 3rd, 36th or 45th Infantry Divisions that the VI Corps Combat Engineers were attached to.We ask that you respect others and use common sense and courtesy at all times. Members who use obscene language and revert to name calling etc., will be banned from further use of this forum.

145 topics in this forum

  1. VI Corps Signal Battalions

    • 3 replies
    • 2259 views
  2. VI Corps Commanders

    • 0 replies
    • 1256 views
  3. Cassino, Italy

    • 16 replies
    • 3174 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1182 views
    • 13 replies
    • 3815 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1435 views
    • 4 replies
    • 1832 views
    • 28 replies
    • 6414 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1292 views
    • 11 replies
    • 2962 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1066 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1674 views
    • 3 replies
    • 1677 views
    • 56 replies
    • 13241 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1085 views
    • 11 replies
    • 2308 views
    • 16 replies
    • 24091 views
    • 2 replies
    • 2282 views
  4. Bennett Palmer

    • 5 replies
    • 94002 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1262 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1210 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1614 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1726 views
    • 9 replies
    • 3249 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1884 views
×